Tuesday, September 27, 2011

10-Ha-azinu -- Mneumonics, friends and foes

See the corresponding song-sheet (if your browser can view PDFs)


Dueteronomy Chapter 32

מג הַרְנִינוּ גוֹיִם עַמּוֹ, כִּי דַם-עֲבָדָיו יִקּוֹם; וְנָקָם יָשִׁיב לְצָרָיו, וְכִפֶּר אַדְמָתוֹ עַמּוֹ

43 Sing aloud, O ye nations, of His people; for He doth avenge the blood of His servants, and doth render vengeance to His adversaries, and doth make expiation for the land of His people


In last week's reading, G!d says in verse 31:21 that the Ha-azinu song will be a witness that would presumably provide some background, or even some message of 'I told you so', when the people sin and dire straits develop. The claim in 31:21 that the song is unforgettable is interesting. The language of the song is poetical and the vocabulary is unusual -- it is not the most easy text to read or understand. However, once learned thoroughly (e.g., in order to recite on Shabbat from the scroll), the distinctive language and imagery may actually help to keep the song in memory. Perhaps unusual phrases and obscure meanings linger longer in memory, because their uniqueness or difficulty prevents them from being confused with, or mneumonically dulled by, any similar but different phrases.

One area of obscurity seems to be the last few verses of the song, e.g., verses 36-43. Earlier in the song G!d had been talking about conquering, almost-destroying, and scattering the Israelites, via the agency of other nations. For most of the song, Israel would seem to be 'the enemy', or at least the target of punishment. In verse 43, however, there seems to be a contrast between the servants, whose blood is avenged, and the adversaries, who receive vengeance. This suggests to me that Israelites are the servants and that those nations by whose agency Israel has been punished are now the adversaries. It could be that some of the preceding verses assume a similar stance toward Israel and the nations. I find them unclear, but I believe that a shift toward siding with the Israelites and holding the 'enemy nations' in disfavor might occur as early as verse 36.

There might be a lesson in the above ambiguity, about the fluidity of the roles of 'servant', 'enemy' or even 'His people'. When we act well, we are the people, the servants. When we don't act well (and others do act well), then we may be 'enemies', or at the very least, our conquerors may not be G!d's enemies. Nowadays we are open to an inclusive alternative where Israel along with other nations all 'act well', and so all of us can be 'the good guys', and there are no longer any 'enemies of G!d'. May it be so!





Saturday, September 24, 2011

9-Va-yeilekh -- It may be up to us!

See the corresponding song-sheet (if your browser can view PDFs)


Dueteronomy Chapter 31

טז וַיֹּאמֶר יְהוָה אֶל-מֹשֶׁה, הִנְּךָ שֹׁכֵב עִם-אֲבֹתֶיךָ; וְקָם הָעָם הַזֶּה וְזָנָה אַחֲרֵי אֱלֹהֵי נֵכַר-הָאָרֶץ, אֲשֶׁר הוּא בָא-שָׁמָּה בְּקִרְבּוֹ, וַעֲזָבַנִי, וְהֵפֵר אֶת-בְּרִיתִי אֲשֶׁר כָּרַתִּי אִתּוֹ

16 And the LORD said unto Moses: 'Behold, thou art about to sleep with thy fathers; and this people will rise up, and go astray after the foreign gods of the land, whither they go to be among them, and will forsake Me, and break My covenant which I have made with them

יז וְחָרָה אַפִּי בוֹ בַיּוֹם-הַהוּא וַעֲזַבְתִּים וְהִסְתַּרְתִּי פָנַי מֵהֶם, וְהָיָה לֶאֱכֹל, וּמְצָאֻהוּ רָעוֹת רַבּוֹת, וְצָרוֹת; וְאָמַר, בַּיּוֹם הַהוּא, הֲלֹא עַל כִּי-אֵין אֱלֹהַי בְּקִרְבִּי, מְצָאוּנִי הָרָעוֹת הָאֵלֶּה

17 Then My anger shall be kindled against them in that day, and I will forsake them, and I will hide My face from them, and they shall be devoured, and many evils and troubles shall come upon them; so that they will say in that day: Are not these evils come upon us because our God is not among us?


This narrative by G!d of future misbehavior by the Israelites, followed by calamitous consequences, sounds quite calm, not at all angry. And these predictions or threats, however calm or angry, include a prediction of reconciliation and return, on the far side of sin and retribution.

The calmness of these statements makes me think that the G!d who would (will) punish does so not literally out of rage or short-temper. A bitter, short-tempered, cynical G!d should have said something more like: They had better not misbehave. Oh, but I know they will. I'm getting a little angry now, just thinking about it. And when they do, I will be ready and happy to blast them. In fact, maybe I should wipe them out right now and be done with it.

The dispassionate G!d of our text seems to be more in line with G!d as an observer of, or even a personification of, the process by which good actions lead to good consequences, and bad actions lead to bad results. Rather than a short-tempered personal G!d responding to our behavior, it is our own behavior, our 'Godding', that determines our consequences.



Friday, September 23, 2011

8-Nitsavim -- Cycles of karma


See the corresponding song-sheet (if your browser can view PDFs)


Dueteronomy Chapter 29

יג וְלֹא אִתְּכֶם, לְבַדְּכֶם--אָנֹכִי, כֹּרֵת אֶת-הַבְּרִית הַזֹּאת, וְאֶת-הָאָלָה, הַזֹּאת
13 Neither with you only do I make this covenant and this oath;

יד כִּי אֶת-אֲשֶׁר יֶשְׁנוֹ פֹּה, עִמָּנוּ עֹמֵד הַיּוֹם, לִפְנֵי, יְהוָה אֱלֹהֵינוּ; וְאֵת אֲשֶׁר אֵינֶנּוּ פֹּה, עִמָּנוּ הַיּוֹם
14 but with him that standeth here with us this day before the LORD our God, and also with him that is not here with us this day

Chapter 30
א וְהָיָה כִי-יָבֹאוּ עָלֶיךָ כָּל-הַדְּבָרִים הָאֵלֶּה, הַבְּרָכָה וְהַקְּלָלָה, אֲשֶׁר נָתַתִּי, לְפָנֶיךָ; וַהֲשֵׁבֹתָ, אֶל-לְבָבֶךָ, בְּכָל-הַגּוֹיִם, אֲשֶׁר הִדִּיחֲךָ יְהוָה אֱלֹהֶיךָ שָׁמָּה

1 And it shall come to pass, when all these things are come upon thee, the blessing and the curse, which I have set before thee, and thou shalt bethink thyself among all the nations, whither the LORD thy God hath driven thee

We see in verses 29:13-14 that this covenant, which invokes both the blessings and the curses presented by Moshe, applies throughout time, not just to the particular population that was about to enter the Promised Land.

Then in verse 30:1, when describing some of these curses that will occur if they sin, Moshe concludes that eventually the people will mend their ways and 'return to G!d'.

It seems a bit unclear to me whether the 'if' of 'if you sin' really carries the force of 'when'. Later, in Chapter 31, both G!d and Moshe seem to clearly say 'when'. In retrospect, of course, history does include sin and subsequent exile.

We can combine the notion of (a) virtue giving way to sin -- i.e., breaking the covenant -- and then back to virtue, with the notion of (b) this covenant, i.e., this potential for virtue/sin, for blessing/curse, applies throughout time, down through the generations. The result suggests a cyclical view of virtue and sin, of good and bad karma. Our straying and returning happens over and over again.

We can hope for and work toward the goal that these cycles behave more like upward spirals. Here might be a reconciliation of free-will, as in verse 30:19's "so choose Life", with a sense of the inevitability of sin. We keep failing, and then improving. Our 'choosing Life' amounts to working to prolong the periods of karmic success, striving to make these periods longer and longer, and eventually (perhaps it has happened already) to end the cyclic regression to sin and the consequent curses, holding on instead to blessing -- for us and the whole world.

In the accompanying song, the arpeggio's in the first part hint at the karmic cycles. The second part expresses longing for more prevalence of the positive parts of these cycles.


Wednesday, September 21, 2011

Advanced Abulafia Permutations

(Produced several years ago.)

Here is a link to an exhaustive (and exhausting) set of recipes for some Abulafia-style Kabbalistic chanting permutations that I produced a few years ago, by way of a computer-program, viz., a Perl-script.

These permutations interleave the four-letter Adni name and the Shem Havayah. This is a relatively complex version of the practice. Beginners might interleave just Aleph (as an indicator of Ayin or Ein Sof) with another word, such as Shem Havayah.

My notation uses English letters to stand for their obvious counterparts among Hebrew letters and vowels. One exception is that I use 'x' for the letter Aleph. The letter 'a' might have been a more-natural choice, except that it already serves to denote the vowel 'a', i.e., one of the five vowel sounds in Hebrew, at least according to Abulafia's characterization of the vowels.

The lists read across and then down. Some groupings are indicated with the punctuation symbols ':' and '|'. Each 'word' in the lists stands for two syllables. E.g., 'xaho' is the first word on the second line of the first recipe. It is chanted: 'A Ho', that is, Aleph with the 'a' sound, Heh with the 'o' sound.

When I chant these permutations, I follow Abulafia's advice and use different tones for the different vowels. Since there are five vowels, I decided to use a pentatonic scale -- one note of the scale consistently used with its corresponding vowel.

There is a lot of available information about Avraham Abulafia. Here's an automatic search (albeit with some excess 'attitude'). Actually, 'Abulafia' was once a common surname, but nowadays, 'Avraham Abulafia' seems usually to refer to the one specific Kabbalist who wrote a lot about this type of chanting.


A Cosmogony Kippah


image
image

(Written several years ago.)

Like this kippah when I take it out of the drawer, creation is constantly unfolding, and sometimes both its splendor and its subtlety can escape our limited attention.

In the case of this kippah, which uses single-crotchet with string-substitutions to depict some of the biblical creation story, I chose a color scheme that would make the images quite understated. The two foreground colors, purple and blue, are set against a background of dark blue. (These images use exaggerated brightness and contrast to help display the kippah.)

In the central area of the kippah we have the primal, initial energies of day and night, yin and yang. They also indicate the interplay of divine immanence with divine transcendance. In their outward-swirling they also suggest k'lipot, the shards of the primordial Divine Light, as well as the differentiation and ramification of matter as a result of Creation...

Moving outward from the central area, the energies coalesce for a while into the evolving week of creation. We have light and dark for the first day; sky, clouds and ocean for day two; and separation of water from land, as well as vegetation, on the third day. The next three days build respectively on the first three. Day four focuses the light into stars, the sun and moon. On the fifth day, fish and birds populate the ocean and the sky. Humans, along with other beasts, arrive on day six. For Shabbat, we have some key symbols of our traditional Friday evening, including candles, a wine goblet, and a hallah.

Moving outward beyond the images of the week, the cosmic energies continue to ramify and multiply, fractally elaborating those first, bold strokes of Creation and Becoming. There are 36 small swirls of emanation just beyond the images of the week, possibly suggesting the subtle metaphysical necessity of the 36 hidden Tsadikim. Since the 36 swirls consist of 18 blue and 18 purple, we also have a reference to double-chai. This could denote our lives at night and during the day, or our lives in our usual, habitual world versus life in the World To Come, or the world of continual Becoming, etc. In any case, the 36 small swirls, together with the 14 initial swirls, make a total of 50, corresponding to the Jubilee notion of large-cycle rejuvenation, the buildup of days from Passover through Shavuot, and so on...
Towards the edge of the kippah are very small pieces of color. In part these suggest a further refinement and subtle emanation of the divine sparks. These sparks start large; then refine somewhat into the world of creation as we know it; but then continue to swirl ad infinitum, spreading further and further throughout the universe and also into smaller and smaller manifestations. If you look very closely, you will see that these bits of color form two successive concentric rows where there is a small but distinct gap consisting of just the background color, and then a C-shaped line of mixed foreground and background colors. The two Cs, 'CC' as one says in an email or memo, suggest that the creative energies keep propagating and replicating. In Hebrew they are two Kafs, spelling the cosmic, zen exhortation, 'Like This!'.

Looking even more deeply, these two Kafs of color micrographically honor the biblical language that celebrates the culmination of creation. In fact, they are a letter by letter encoding of the full Hebrew text of the familiar Va-y'khulu paragraph. For the encoding, I used a text-specific, minimal-stitch mapping of letters to stitches, where more-frequent letters map to shorter sequences of stitches. The mapping is given in the Appendix, below. Note that several Hebrew letters do not appear in the Va-y'khulu paragraph, and so mappings for these letters are omitted. Note also that in order to avoid issues about going into the bathroom while wearing this kippah, I followed the usual convention of changing a Heh to a Kuf in some divine names, resulting in the use of the word 'elokim'.

Harking back to our numerological musings, the 35 words of Va-y'khulu, plus the 36 swirls, add up to 71, just one shy of the length of one of the more obscure, mystical divine names. That last, missing one could be you, the observer, or perhaps the kippah as a whole...

There is some nice symbolism even in the nature of the crocheting of the kippah. Except for a special technique which makes the two Cs of Va-y'khulu come out in concentric circles, the apparently concentric rows of the kippah are in fact slowly unwinding spirals. This can symbolize some of the cycles of our tradition and of our lives and history. If we're mindful, holy, and perhaps a bit graced, then we don't keep coming back to precisely the same place each year, week, decade. Rather we deepen and further our experience, even as we come back again and again to similar situations or seasons...

I opted for loose strings on the underside of the kippah. An alternative would have been to carry all the locally unused strings inside the other stitches. I chose to avoid the esthetic tradeoff of colors peeking through when they are being so 'carried'. These loose strings are perhaps also an allusion to the possibility of cosmic string-theory, or even the Philotic strands of cosmic love and connection in the works of Orson Scott Card.

image


Appendix: Mapping for text-encoding.

'P' denotes one purple stitch
'B' denotes one blue stitch 

There is one background (dark blue) stitch after
each 'letter', except that there are two background
stitches at the end of each word.

Note that the letters gimel, zayin, het, tet, nun,
samech and peh do not occur in the Va-y'khulu paragraph.

Aleph    PP
Bet      BBB
Gimel
Dalet    BBBB (this letter occurred rarely in our text)
Heh      PBB
Vav      P    (a very frequent letter in the text)
Zayin
Het
Tet
Yod      B
Kaf      PPP
Lamed    PB
Mem      BB
Nun
Samech
Ayin     PPB
Peh
Tsadi    PBP
Kuf      BPB
Resh     BPP
Shin     BP
Tav      BBP

A Quasi-Freudian Rhapsody on the Clarinet as Ambassador of Diversity and Gender Relations

(Written several years ago.)

image
image
A standard Bb clarinet consists of a set of pieces that come together in this way: The mouthpiece attaches to the barrel, which attaches to the upper joint, which connects with the lower joint, which is capped by the bell. The connections all occur as one end of one piece fits inside one end of another piece. Or, from another perspective, it's some pieces engulfing others. The connecting parts of the pieces are designated male or female, according to conventional observation of whether they go, respectively (and respectfully), inside or outside.

There is a very strong message of diversity, collaboration and tolerance in the 'gender' of the clarinet and its parts. For instance, the assembled instrument as a whole is both male (phallic) but also female (concave at the bell and in the inner chamber). It also seems particularly more male at the mouthpiece end and more female at the other (bell) end. The range of notes one can play on the instrument extends from the bass (male) range well into, even beyond, the soprano (female) range.

If we consider again the 'genders' of the connecting portions of each part of the clarinet, then the community of the clarinet's parts includes a single male (the mouthpiece), a female (the bell), a female-female couple (the barrel), a male-male couple (the lower joint), and a male-female couple (the upper joint). These correspond to all the gender-combinations of individuals and couples in our diverse society. Another way to think of it is that the clarinet parts represent our 'atoms' and 'fundamental molecules' of gender-relations.

Only when we integrate all of these clarinet-pieces to make the assembled clarinet, do we achieve the glorious musical potential that the instrument offers. If we omit any of the parts, then the clarinet does not function well at all! This suggests to me that as we engage in our communities, we need to honor, cherish, and make use of the diverse, vital interconnections and contributions that arise from the interplay of individuals and couples of diverse gender (and other) energies.

In the cosmic symphony of creation, let us all play our parts as individuals, couples, families and communities, recognizing and respecting the essential need for some folks to play similar parts and others to play different but equally important parts.


Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Yih-yu-l-ratson -- Focusing intentionality

See the corresponding song-sheet (if your browser can view PDFs)


טו יִהְיוּ לְרָצוֹן אִמְרֵי-פִי, וְהֶגְיוֹן לִבִּי לְפָנֶיךָ: יְהוָה, צוּרִי וְגֹאֲלִי

15 Let the words of my mouth and the meditation of my heart be acceptable before Thee, O LORD, my Rock, and my Redeemer


The conventional translation makes this verse (Psalms 19:15) a supplication: Let my words and thoughts be acceptable before you, G!d, my rock and redeemer.

The following is a reading of the verse as a psycho-spiritual, mystical affirmation, a focusing of intentionality:

May I manage my thoughts and words so that they cohere and integrate as an expression and exercise of (good or G!d's) will. (This part replaces "Let my words and thoughts be to [your] will, i.e. acceptable".)

And let those coherent, good-willful thoughts and words bring me further and further inside, or in consonance with, the G!d-field. (This part moves from 'face' to 'inside' in the idiom 'before you', which more literally says 'to your face'. It thus replaces "... my words and thoughts ... before you ...".)

Similarly, may what I (choose to) hear and see, may the works of my hands, may what I feel (and place) in my gut, also contribute to my own psycho-spiritual coherence, and my consonance with the G!d-field.

If you look at the song-sheet and know Hebrew, I would welcome comments that suggest improvements or alternatives to my current new-lyrics to address sights, sounds, deeds, ingestion and intuitions:

"einai oznai yadai mei-ai"

6-Ki-Teitsei -- Amalek off the hook

See the corresponding song-sheet (if your browser can view PDFs)

Dueteronomy Chapter 25


יז  זָכוֹר, אֵת אֲשֶׁר-עָשָׂה לְךָ עֲמָלֵק, בַּדֶּרֶךְ, בְּצֵאתְכֶם מִמִּצְרָיִם

יח  אֲשֶׁר קָרְךָ בַּדֶּרֶךְ, וַיְזַנֵּב בְּךָ כָּל-הַנֶּחֱשָׁלִים אַחֲרֶיךָ--וְאַתָּה, עָיֵף וְיָגֵעַ; וְלֹא יָרֵא, אֱלֹהִים

יט  וְהָיָה בְּהָנִיחַ יְהוָה אֱלֹהֶיךָ לְךָ מִכָּל-אֹיְבֶיךָ מִסָּבִיב, בָּאָרֶץ אֲשֶׁר יְהוָה-אֱלֹהֶיךָ נֹתֵן לְךָ נַחֲלָה לְרִשְׁתָּהּ--תִּמְחֶה אֶת-זֵכֶר עֲמָלֵק, מִתַּחַת הַשָּׁמָיִם; לֹא, תִּשְׁכָּח

17 Remember what Amalek did unto thee by the way as ye came forth out of Egypt;

18 how he met thee by the way, and smote the hindmost of thee, all that were enfeebled in thy rear, when thou wast faint and weary; and he feared not God.

19 Therefore it shall be, when the LORD thy God hath given thee rest from all thine enemies round about, in the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee for an inheritance to possess it, that thou shalt blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven; thou shalt not forget.


An earlier section in the par'shah gives the harsh law about executing a 'rebellious son'. My favorite rabbinic treatment of this harsh law reads the text so as to make the criteria of the case impossible to fulfill. (The two parents would need to have acoustically identical voices.) Thus no-one ever qualifies for the punishment that the Torah mandates for this son. The law is merely moot, a (perhaps) interesting 'theoretical legalistic exercise'.

Our current text is usually (always?) read as commanding that genocide be carried out against Amalek. It says 'blot out the remembrance...'. This law may have made moral sense in the historical context of the Biblical period, but certainly it troubles us nowadays, especially in the aftermath of the Holocaust and other attempted (or successful) campaigns of genocide that we know about.

A close reading of the Amalek text, however, yields a mooting of this law, reminiscent of the mooting of the law about the rebellious son. Verse 19 indicates when the Israelites are to perform this blotting out: "b'hani-ach Adonai elohekha ... mikol oy'vekha misaviv", i.e., when (or while) G!d gives you rest from all your surrounding enemies. So this blotting must occur only when/while the Israelites have no active enemies. Now even if there ever was a period when there were no active enemies, that period would end, by definition, as soon as the Israelites undertook action against Amalek. So the conditions antecedent to this 'blotting out' can never be achieved.

This reading offers a solution to the 'traditional' puzzle about being commanded to remember to wipe out a memory: What we are really supposed to remember are the (impossible) criteria associated with this law, so that we never undertake that type of revenge.

7-Ki-Tavo-28-6 -- Always arriving

See the corresponding song-sheet (if your browser can view PDFs)


Dueteronomy Chapter 28


ו בָּרוּךְ אַתָּה, בְּבֹאֶךָ; וּבָרוּךְ אַתָּה, בְּצֵאתֶךָ 

6 Blessed shalt thou be when thou comest in, and blessed shalt thou be when thou goest out


When the angels of Jacob's Ladder are described as 'ascending and descending', some commentators take the order of the verbs very seriously and ask, shouldn't they have descended first (from their headquarters 'on high'). We won't explore that question now. However, in this verse one might ask a similar question: Shouldn't they 'go out' (from home) before they 'come (back) in'?

There is a hint here of process, of impermanence, of flow. We are never really completely settled, stable, finished, but always in flux, always arriving at a new place. Our 'base of operations' is the dynamic flow of the G!d-force, of our actions / karma, and of the changes occurring in others and in the world. Thus the 'leaving' of where we had been is less primary, more of an after-effect, than is our continual arriving at The Present, The Now.